Written by: Kristel Sheesley, Program Manager, University of Maryland Environmental Finance Center
An aerial view of a circular wastewater treatment clarifier tank filled with calm, dark blue water that reflects white clouds and a blue sky. A large, white metal truss bridge structure extends from the outer edge to a smaller concentric ring in the center of the tank, acting as the rotating scraper mechanism. Bright green grass surrounds the top and left sides of the concrete tank structure, and a grey paved path runs along the top right.

© Adobe Stock, Kletr

State Revolving Fund (SRF) programs are a valuable source of funding for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure projects, offering low-interest financing, favorable loan terms, and for qualifying applicants and projects, partial or complete principal forgiveness.

But if your system is new to SRF, the application process may seem daunting. To help demystify this funding path, we gathered seasoned SRF borrowers in a series of focus group sessions, to learn the secrets to their success. These systems represented both small and large utilities across the Mid-Atlantic and were commended by their state SRF programs for having especially successful SRF applications and/or projects (see Table 1).

We asked these systems about their SRF experience – what worked for them and what advice they would give systems who are new to this funding source. Here’s a summary of what we heard.

Table 1: Exemplary SRF applications / projects

Know timelines and requirements

Familiarize yourself with your state SRF application timelines and requirements. Have a general understanding of federal rules that may apply to your project, including Build America, Buy America (BABA); American Iron and Steel (AIS); and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) provisions.

Start early

Allow ample time to gather required information like financials and to communicate with decision makers and the public. In some states, there is a short window between notification of potential funding and deadline for full applications, so having documents in place is key to a timely submission.

Build your team

Since SRF applications require data from various departments, regular communication with utility staff is essential. For many applicants, engaging an experienced engineer was critical to the application’s success. Experienced borrowers also emphasize the importance of staying in touch with SRF staff throughout the process, which keeps things moving smoothly.

Consider using in-house expertise

If possible, utilizing in-house labor for planning, engineering, and construction can be cheaper than contracting these services out.

Take advantage of TA

While not a replacement for a utility’s staff or contracted engineer, no-cost technical assistance is often available and can be a game-changer in getting projects off the ground or in overcoming roadblocks.

Look for pre-development grants

Consider seeking funding for pre-application planning if your state offers it. This can be essential in getting your project shovel-ready with biddable drawings, technical specifications, and regulatory permits in place so that you are ready to hit the ground running when it’s time to submit a full application.

Clearly define your project and budget

Applications with a clear scope, solid cost estimates, measurable outcomes, and a realistic and well-defined project schedule are more likely to be successful. In your project description, tell a compelling story, clearly identify the problem that can’t otherwise be solved without the SRF funding, and highlight any co-benefits. Some borrowers suggested being willing to propose an innovative idea.

Obtain a financial audit

Required for SRF application in many states, this can be especially helpful for small water systems in putting together budget estimates.

Build in flexibility where you can

Develop a project description that allows some flexibility as the project evolves. Include contingency funds in your initial application to cover unforeseen expenses. Borrowers that had flexibility to shift budget funds (from engineering to construction, for example) avoided under- or over-spending.

Use a phased approach

Completing larger projects in phases can be more logistically and financially feasible for small systems.

If your system needs help getting started with the SRF application process or determining whether SRF funding may be a good fit for your project – EFCN’s no-cost technical assistance may help. Learn more and contact us here.

Additional Resources: